At 8:00 tonight, the original production of Fun Home will play its final performance
on Broadway.
It’s the right time for it—the show lasted for a year and a half,
which is a solid run. This was never the sort of show that was going to have
some sort of record-breaking performance, and in some ways it’s nice to see it
end before replacement casts come in (this was a show much more connected with
its original cast members than most, probably due to its more intimate nature).
All the same, it’s a shame to see it go. Even if the show
itself was realistically never going to run more than a few years, it’s the
exact sort of show one likes to see on Broadway. If we treat Broadway as a
physical space defined by the works that exist within it, Fun Home was the type of show that just made that physical space
stronger. Even if it wasn’t a show you would choose to see, it was good to know
that something of that artistic ambition and real-world values was a part of Broadway.
Fun Home is,
ostensibly, a memory play. Coined by Tennessee Williams to describe his own Glass Menagerie, a memory play exists
primarily within the character’s, well, memories. The story unfolds as their
recollection of past events in a more unconventional, stylistic manner than
what is generally traditional for American theatre. Certainly this appears to apply to Fun Home, a musical that is almost
entirely through-composed about Alison Bechdel’s recollections of her father,
and delivered in a way that plays with narrative structure, time jumps, and
deliberate elision of specific memories.
But there’s a crucial difference in Fun Home that I think separates it from a true memory play. The
nature of a show being from the vantage point of a character’s memory is that
it necessarily calls the events of the play into question, as the “truth” of a
scene is limited to what the character may choose to remember. A memory play
toys with the idea of unreliable narrators and memories that can’t be trusted,
and Fun Home rather noticeably avoids
that. The first scene of the show is indicative of how memories work
here—notice how Bruce mentions hauling in the box of junk from Mr. Gibbon’s
barn, and when Alison recalls the same event later in the scene, she has to correct
herself—“you were so ecstatic when you found it in a yard sale—no, no, wait, in
Mr. Gibbon’s barn”.
In other words, the scene makes it clear that the memory is the correct version of events,
irrespective of how Alison remembers it. This is reflected throughout the
piece, as Alison’s vantage points for various scenes are written texts and
physical objects—a piece of silver, a childhood diary, a college letter—physical
manifestations of immutable events. Alison thus exists on the periphery of
these events—an observer peering in to make sense of what happened. In a sense,
it’s the inverse of a memory play. Where a memory play is a defined character
creating uncertain memories, Fun Home
is an uncertain character finding herself within defined memories.
I remember seeing Fun
Home for the first time, almost a full year ago. It was a vivid semester
for me, such that it’s hard to focus on that specific memory without a flood of
others rushing in. It was my second year as a theatre major, having dropped out
of film school to hesitantly pursue it the year before. It was my first
semester as the music theory tutor for my school. I remember taking Intro to Makeup, which ended up becoming an
unexpectedly formative class for me. I remember taking Acting II, and through
it forming a very deep bond with one of my most valued friends. I remember
meeting for the first time three people that would become uniquely special to
me in ways I could never have predicted, and I remember the continuous work of
rehearsal for the fall musical (The
Addams Family), underlying all the other events such that the semester
feels ensconced within the temporal reality of the production.
And of course, I remember flying up to New York for one day to
see Sydney Lucas’s final performance in Fun
Home.
It’s hard to describe the extent to which, as a college student
in Arizona who lives with his parents, this was something I never thought would
happen for me. The idea of impulsively flying to New York to see a Broadway show
was so far from the realm of possibility it never even occurred to me as
something I could ever do. But then the announcement that Lucas was leaving the
show came, and an offhand thought about trying to go see it turned into an
actual consideration. I remember talking with friends during makeup class about
it, slowly convincing myself of the possibility, and my friend in Acting II
telling me that ultimately, no matter the drawbacks, this was one of those
things I would never be able to do again, and for that reason alone I should go
for it. A few days later, after I
found lodgings with a friend who attended NYU and my dad discovered a voucher
at Southwest airlines, the trip suddenly became a reality.
I had only recently discovered Fun Home, a few weeks before the Tony awards that summer, but it
had rapidly risen to be my favorite musical by the time the trip happened. I
remember friends in Addams rehearsals
telling me how jealous they were that I was going. I remember the flight to New
York (two stops there, and one stop and a plane change on the way back), and
getting lost on the way to Union Square, where my friend’s dorm was located. I
remember the constant anxiety that something was going to happen to prevent me
from seeing the show, and I remember the final relief when it washed away as I sat
down in my seat. I remember the audience immediately applauding when Lucas made
her entrance (and then awkwardly applauding Cerveris when he made his). I
remember being stunned by the final set transition into the house as Emily
Skeggs and Lauren Patten enter, crystallizing in a moment the truly bizarre
nature of the Bechdel house. I remember the light swooping by Michael Cerveris
and Beth Malone during “Telephone Wire”, simulating the passing traffic
throughout the song. I remember Malone holding back tears as she delivered the
final line staring at Lucas. And I remember the entire cast coming out after
bows, along with Sam Gold, Jeanine Tesori, and Lisa Kron, hugging goodbye to Sydney
Lucas.
The character of Alison (or “Big Al”, as the fan colloquialism
goes) is of course the key to what makes Fun
Home work. It was a choice that Kron and Tesori fought for against strong
objections (Tony Kushner notably thought the character should be cut
altogether), and it uniquely crystallizes what the core of the show is. It’s
easy to imagine an adaptation of Fun Home
that works as a literal, chronological representation of the events in the
book, or a version where Alison acts only as narrator, never involved with the
narrative at play.
But instead, Kron and Tesori make the choice to center the
entire show around Alison as a character, and use the events of the narrative
as a means of catharsis for her emotional arc. It’s a fictionalized arc, to be
sure—there’s no real indication that the real-life Alison Bechdel went through
a similar arc when writing Fun Home: A
Family Tragicomic, but in many ways the clear distinction between Alison
Bechdel the real-life cartoonist and Alison the fictional character works in
the show’s favor. At any rate, the show arises out of her perspective—of facing
the task of writing about her troubled relationship with her father and her own
coming out as a lesbian, and coming to terms with the parallels she finds
between her and her father, a closeted gay man who committed suicide at the age
Alison is at the start of the show.
![]() |
| One of the main musical building blocks in the score |
What characterizes Alison’s arc is that she pointedly refuses
to engage with the events she observes, constantly distancing herself with
ironic comments or observational captions. It’s not a repression of the events
displayed, but a shield that prevents her from truly connecting with important parts
of her life. In the score, Tesori utilizes precise, carefully-chosen voicings
that make the most out of sparse arrangements and minimalist construction. Out
of these comes a major musical building block of a repeated pair of three-note
figures, with the bottom note rising a whole step then stepping down again. It’s
a musical ambiguity that extends out of Alison’s precise uncertainty when she
begins writing, and this sort of extension applies to much of the score. Note
how Helen’s piano scales appear as underscoring in the opening number,
highlighting the connection between the scene and Alison’s memory.
![]() |
| Helen's scales underscore "Opening: It All Comes Back" |
The opening number is itself an impressive feat of laying out many of the musical ideas that reoccur throughout the show—in particular the ones that occur as motifs for both Alison and Bruce. These motifs appear first in precise, carefully defined patterns—both Alison and Bruce are masking their own insecurities with a forced order, Alison in her drawing and Bruce in his restoration work. But it unravels rapidly, both as the historical reality of Bruce’s life takes hold, and the present emotional arc for Alison becomes more and more pressing, and finally results in a free-flowing explosion of chordal material as Bruce sings “Edges of the World”, and Alison is finally forced to confront her father’s suicide.
![]() |
| The formalism breaks down: First image from "Opening: It All Comes Back", Remaining images from "Edges of the World" |
The formalism of the opening number returns in the finale, but this time with a new sort of flowing quality—where the opening had been in a strict 4/4, “Flying Away” flits between 6/8 and 5/8, carrying with it a gentler, freer quality. As Alison faces the memory she tried in vain to avoid, she learns how to use it. The memory ceases to be a burden and instead becomes a tool for change and progression.
It’s almost unnecessary to say that seeing Fun Home live completely changed me, but it truly had a unique
impact coming in the midst of such an eventful semester. It wasn’t my first
time in New York (I had gone twice as part of high school drama trips), but it
was my first time going alone. For whatever reason, where I had been
intimidated and almost terrified by the city during the high school trips, I
managed to completely fall in love with it on my own, finally able to approach
it on my own terms. The Fun Home trip
started a series of New York visits, and instilled in me a desire to live in
the city someday—a monumental step forward from even a year before when I
approached the idea with a sense of dreadful inevitability. It also finally
cemented for me the need to work in theatre: where before I was oscillating between
theatre and music, still uncertain of my goals, in that semester I became
completely and totally confident that theatre was the right place for me.
Suddenly there was a tangible reality to my dreams—an actual destination to
work towards rather than a hypothesized possibility. And then, of course, some
three months after I saw the show I came out as bisexual. And while I can’t
credit the show with that realization, it’s difficult to argue there’s not at
least some implicit connection between the two events.
Ultimately, Fun Home
is about the self. It’s looking at who you were to help inform who you are and
where you need to go. And it’s important, as we commemorate its closing, to
think about the importance this show carried. It was the first all-female writing
team to win the Tony Award for best score. It broke new ground in queer
representation, telling a story from a vantage point that is criminally
underfed in the today’s media. The effect the show has had on LGBTIA+ people throughout
the nation, particularly the youth, cannot be understated. And I think it’s
important that we not let that fall away. Fun
Home shouldn’t become some deserted avenue of history, representing a
possible path of progression that was never taken. It’s important that we take
the steps it gave us and keep going—to better ourselves as individuals, as a
people, and as a society.
As the final performance tonight is consigned to memory, let us
engage that memory and create works that will be for future audiences what Fun Home was for us.








No comments:
Post a Comment